by Thrillofit » Mon Jul 18, 2016 1:23 pm
by gvmdaddy » Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:52 pm
by Thrillofit » Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:28 pm
gvmdaddy wrote:First off all it depends on what you are calling 'issues' and its a bit too soon to report on reliability etc for a 2016 model.
To be honest the QQ wouldnt be such a poular best selling car if it had major biuld or reliability problems. The problems that do get discussed, although a problem for those concerned, are few and far between.
by jackdaww » Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:46 pm
by Thrillofit » Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:49 pm
jackdaww wrote:tihis is not just about feedback on this blog.
it is the case that consumer association "which" reliability reviews gave the first generation qq 4 stars i think , but the j11 gets just 2 stars .
that is a massive drop .
by jackdaww » Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:57 pm
by craigstekna » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:24 pm
by SplanK » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:29 pm
craigstekna wrote:Whats the difference between a late 2014 Tekna and a 2016 Tekna? A few quirks may have been changed but I wasn't aware there was even a slight facelift or feature change?
by SplanK » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:36 pm
craigstekna wrote: Cars are built for global conditions and temperature, if you want the best performance and fuel economy you want to get it mapped for your countries conditions. Besides another 30BHP isn't a bad thing
by craigstekna » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:54 pm